(Gutman, n.d, pp. 18 -- 24) (Fishkin, n.d, 25 -- 28) The biggest weakness of the deliberative process is: that many minorities will often have major issues that are overlooked. This is problematic, because these kinds of groups inside a community will have their own special needs. In some cases, they want to address past injustices that have occurred. While at other times, they are seeking to gain advantages that can help members of their community.

In a deliberative democracy, the views of the different minorities can often be ignored by the influences of the majority. Where, they (the majority) could force these minority groups to give up more, based upon the influence they have in the process. Once this occurs, it means that you will see policies and laws enacted, that will give advantages to one particular group over the other. (Gutman, n.d, pp. 18 -- 24) (Fishkin, n.d, 25 -- 28)

Is this a better alternative?

Yes and no. This is a better alternative form of government in that: the various policies and regulations will take into account logic as a part of the process. This will ensure that any kind of programs that are implemented is based upon: their effectiveness in addressing the various issues facing the community. Over the course of time, this will increase transparency and it will create programs that address the needs of citizens....

(Gutman, n.d, pp. 18 -- 24) (Fishkin, n.d, 25 -- 28)
While at the same time, this form of government can mean that many of these policies will benefit the majority. This is because the majority will be able to influence the decisions that are being made by the citizens of the community. As, they can claim that their form of government is based upon: the opinions of the majority, not the dissent from the minority. Over the course of time, this can cause many minorities to receive less favorable treatment in comparison with other groups. In this aspect, this form of government is not a better alternative. This is because they are: indirectly discriminating against minorities and it encourages this environment to exist (based upon the policies that have been enacted). (Gutman, n.d, pp. 18 -- 24) (Fishkin, n.d, 25 -- 28)

Clearly, deliberative democracies can ensure greater transparency and more balanced policies. While at the same time, it is ignoring the needs of minorities. This is significant, because it is: showing the overall strengths and weaknesses of this form of government. As, it can address the needs of: large segments of the populations, while ignoring the necessities of others.

Bibliography

Fishkin, J. (n.d.). The Voice of the People. 25 -- 28.

Gutman, A. (n.d.). Democracy and Disagreement. 18 -- 24.